FREE PLAN
Civil Engineering · Structural

Section Properties

Moment of inertia and section modulus for rectangular, circular, and hollow-circular (tube) sections about the centroidal bending axis.

Standard method — stated scope limits apply
Shape
Choose a shape and enter dimensions.

About This Calculation

Moment of inertia and section modulus describe how a cross-section resists bending, independent of the material it’s made from — a bigger moment of inertia means less curvature (and deflection) for the same bending moment, and a bigger section modulus means lower peak bending stress for the same moment. Every beam or column calculation needs one or both of these as an input, which is why this is usually the very first calculation done before a beam deflection or column buckling check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does a deeper beam resist bending so much better than a wider one of the same cross-sectional area?

Both moment of inertia and section modulus for a rectangle scale with the CUBE (or square) of height but only linearly with width — material placed further from the bending axis (further from the centroid) contributes disproportionately more stiffness and strength, which is exactly why I-beams put most of their material in the top and bottom flanges, far from the neutral axis.

What is the practical difference between moment of inertia and section modulus?

Moment of inertia (I) is used for deflection and buckling calculations; section modulus (S = I / distance to extreme fibre) is used directly for bending stress (σ = M/S). They come from the same underlying geometry but answer two different questions — "how much does it deflect" versus "what stress does it see".

How is a hollow (tube) section’s moment of inertia different from a solid one?

It’s the solid section’s moment of inertia minus the "missing" inner section’s moment of inertia (I = π(D⁴−d⁴)/64) — removing material from near the center (where it contributes little to bending resistance anyway) barely reduces stiffness while meaningfully reducing weight, which is the whole rationale for using tube sections.

Does this cover I-beams, channels, or angle sections?

Not directly — this covers solid rectangles, solid circles, and hollow circles (tubes), which have simple closed-form formulas. Standard rolled steel sections (I-beams, channels, angles) have properties published directly in steel section tables rather than needing to be calculated from basic geometry.
Built with ♥ — Dr. Kundan